On Friday we had a special guest, Michael Orcutt, a plan reviewer for Charleston County, come in and give our construction documents a quick look through. He was previously a building inspector, so he has a strong background with building code. As one of only three reviewers for the county, we are very grateful that he took time out of his busy schedule to meet with us.
He explained that one of the first things reviewers typically assess is the intended function of the structure. To provide context, we (Nolan) gave a brief presentation of our project, offering background information and explaining how the conservancy plans to use the pavilion.
After the introduction, we gathered to discuss the printed drawings together. Michael provided insight into the review process. He mentioned that documentation is typically sent in as a digital PDF through an online portal. This allows them to easily examine the files using software such as Bluebeam. He mentioned that reviewers generally avoid marking up or redlining PDFs, leaving those revisions for the architects and engineers since these can sometimes be manipulated. Instead, they submit a general report in the comments section through the portal.
Reviewers have two weeks (or 10 business days) to complete a review, and projects are typically addressed in the order they are received through a queue. Once comments are returned to the architect, there is no fee for a resubmittal. However, the county is considering implementing a fee for revisions, as repeated submissions (sometimes seven or eight rounds) can be time-consuming. He emphasized the importance of calling for clarification on comments to avoid unnecessary resubmissions.
Returning to our project, we reviewed the cover page and discussed standard code information, including seismic zoning and the applicable building code. Michael recommended that, in addition to the site plan, we include a life safety plan addressing fire safety. He also closely examined the structural details, explaining that reviewers verify that structural engineers have properly stamped the documents. Because this is a government liability issue, they ensure that the structure corresponds to the correct seismic zone and includes accurate and complete details.
Lastly, we discussed his experience with inspections. He explained that we will need to complete an inspection packet and schedule inspections as needed. Typically, inspectors can come out the next day after a request is made. However, if they visit a site in the morning, they will not return later the same day for a follow-up inspection.
This week, as we wait for John to send back some structural corrections, we will turn our attention to some work on the Stephen Washington project. We hope to spend time in the shop learning welding techniques so we can complete the benches and tables for which we created shop drawings earlier in the semester. We will also be collecting and organizing documentation for the work we have done this semester since we only have two weeks left of the semester. Final stretch before summer!